1. Guest
  2. Login | Subscribe
 
     
Forgot Login?  

FREE Newsletter Subscription, Click The 'Subscribe' Button Below To Subscribe!

Weekday News Bulletin

PortMac.News FREE Weekday Email News Bulletin

Be better informed, subscribe to our FREE weekday news Update service here:

PortMac Menu

Under the AUKUS partnership struck in September, the leaders of the United Kingdom and the United States have agreed to work with Australia on how to build a new class of nuclear-powered submarines.

Source : PortMac.News | Independent :

Source : PortMac.News | Independent | News Story:

main-block-ear
 
US and UK begin jostling to supply nuclear submarine fleet
Under the AUKUS partnership struck in September, the leaders of the United Kingdom and the United States have agreed to work with Australia on how to build a new class of nuclear-powered submarines.

News Story Summary:

Just before the outbreak of World War I, the fledgling Royal Australian Navy turned to the "Mother country" for its first submarine and more than a century later, Britain is again likely to play a pivotal role.

The British built AE1 was commissioned at Portsmouth in February 1914 and accompanied by her sister AE2, departed England for Sydney the following month.

In September that year, AE1 disappeared and no trace was found of the submarine's 35 crew — 14 Royal Australian Navy members and 21 members of the Royal Navy.

In 2021, the Australian Defence Force is again considering what role the Royal Navy could play in developing its next submarines, or whether like many modern acquisitions, it will focus on interoperability with American technology.

Under the AUKUS partnership struck in September, the leaders of the United Kingdom and the United States have agreed to work with Australia on how to build a new class of nuclear-powered submarines.

Over the next 18 months, the Nuclear-Powered Submarine Task Force inside the Department of Defence will lead a study into the numerous regulatory issues involved in the ownership and operation of nuclear-powered boats.

While the design is not yet known, or what the criteria will be, for many commentators the existing British Astute-class is emerging as an early favourite for Australia to replace the Collins-class fleet.

Others inside the defence industry believe any nuclear-powered Australian submarine will need to be an American boat, based on the Virginia-class so that it can be serviced at nearby US bases in Guam or Japan.

Both the British and US options have various advantages and disadvantages, which highlight the extraordinarily complex process the ADF faces to select a nuclear-powered submarine — which may never actually eventuate.

Already the regulatory challenges appear significant, as nothing is more complex and costly in the military world than nuclear-powered submarines, particularly for a country with no domestic nuclear industry.

In the United States, an eminent group of former officials and experts has written to President Joe Biden warning the AUKUS deal could threaten national security by encouraging hostile nations to obtain highly enriched uranium (HEU).

Australia insists it will uphold its commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but the engineering sector warns it will be a steep learning curve for the Defence Department.

The now dumped Attack class submarine being designed by France's Naval Group was based on the Barracuda class, which lost three years in development because of less complex regulatory issues associated with low enriched uranium (LEU).

"This is a very long-term effort that'll be decades, I think, before a submarine goes in the water," US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Gilday predicted last month.

The Pentagon is yet to decide who will run the submarine process for the US under the new AUKUS agreement but Admiral Gilday warns, "I don't see this as a short-term timeline".

Despite Prime Minister Scott Morrison's boast of a "Forever partnership" in which the United States is willing to share its secret nuclear technology in a "One-off" deal, some still doubt the Pentagon will be prepared to part with its "Crown jewels".

On the British side, the experience of building the nuclear-powered Astute fleet has been far from easy, requiring assistance from US submarine builder Electric Boat, which also provided advice to Australia's Collins-class program.

Given the two-year delay now projected for Australia's British designed Hunter-class frigates, some inside Defence believe there may also be a reluctance to again rely too heavily on the "Mother country" on a far more complex and bigger submarine project.

Story By | Andrew Greene


Same | News Story' Author : Staff-Editor-02

Users | Click above to view Staff-Editor-02's 'Member Profile'

Share This Information :

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

Add A Comment :


Security code

Please enter security code from above or Click 'Refresh' for another code.

Refresh


All Comments are checked by Admin before publication

Guest Menu

All Content & Images Copyright Portmac.news & Xitranet© 2013-2024 | Site Code : 03601